District Court Finds Use of a Method to Manufacture a Product Does Not Indirectly Infringe a Patented Method to Design A Product

The US District Court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's indirect patent infringement claims for failure to properly allege that the 'accused' product was 'made' by the defendant under the language of § 271(g), where the plaintiff acknowledged during design only the claimed methods are used but not for physical manufacture so that production of information is not covered under the statute.

Bild durch KI erstellt